<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s All Forget IE6 With Good Reason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mccolin.com/blog/2009/07/30/grow-some-balls-and-drop-ie6-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mccolin.com/blog/2009/07/30/grow-some-balls-and-drop-ie6-support/</link>
	<description>Colin McCloskey rants and raves and sometimes forgets to update</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 05:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://mccolin.com/blog/2009/07/30/grow-some-balls-and-drop-ie6-support/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colinmccloskey.com/blog/?p=87#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>Right. It&#039;s fine to ask us designers to *support* the site in IE6, but expecting pixel-perfect adjustments for the browser is a waste of time, effort, and money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. It&#8217;s fine to ask us designers to *support* the site in IE6, but expecting pixel-perfect adjustments for the browser is a waste of time, effort, and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Vincent</title>
		<link>http://mccolin.com/blog/2009/07/30/grow-some-balls-and-drop-ie6-support/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colinmccloskey.com/blog/?p=87#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>Yes, for the love of God, YES. At the very *least*, charge extra (and charge fairly!) for IE6 support. Or do one even better and really be part of the solution and just refuse to waste time on it altogether. Eventually the IT departments still keeping IE6 alive will have to face the reality that their old intranet systems are long due for an upgrade, and likely an expensive one, and perhaps learn the hard lesson that choosing to exclusively use a proprietary platform to power core business components can have costly long-term consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, for the love of God, YES. At the very *least*, charge extra (and charge fairly!) for IE6 support. Or do one even better and really be part of the solution and just refuse to waste time on it altogether. Eventually the IT departments still keeping IE6 alive will have to face the reality that their old intranet systems are long due for an upgrade, and likely an expensive one, and perhaps learn the hard lesson that choosing to exclusively use a proprietary platform to power core business components can have costly long-term consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
